Pass4Test 의 Juniper JN0-694덤프는 Juniper JN0-694시험에 도전장을 던진 분들이 신뢰할수 있는 든든한 길잡이 입니다. Juniper JN0-694시험대비 덤프뿐만아니라 다른 IT인증시험에 대비한 덤프자료도 적중율이 끝내줍니다. Juniper JN0-694 시험이나 다른 IT인증자격증시험이나 Pass4Test제품을 사용해보세요.투자한 덤프비용보다 훨씬 큰 이득을 보실수 있을것입니다.
NO.1 You are implementing Q-in-Q tunneling on an EX Series switch. You want the tunnel to support
all C-VLANs; however, only some VLANs are able to send traffic across the tunnel.
Switch-1 has the following configuration:
[edit vlans]
user@Switch-1# show
v100 {
vlan-id 100;
interface {
ge-0/ 0/ 0.10;
ge-0/ 0/1.20;
}
dot1q-tunneling {
customer-vlans [ ];
}
}
What would solve this problem?
A. Add family ethernet-switching to the tunnel-side interface on Switch-1.
B. Implement RSTP .
C. Q-in-Q tunneling will not work in this scenario; use a Layer 2 VPN instead.
D. Remove the customer-vlans statement.
Answer: C
NO.2 You observe that a router is using an unusually high amount of CPU cycles.
You determine that continuous SPF calculations in OSPF are being performed.
What are two reasons for this problem? (Choose two.)
A. The wrong authentication keys between the OSPF neighbors are used.
B. The interface MTU is mismatched between the OSPF neighbors.
C. There are duplicate router IDs within the OSPF area.
D. An OSPF adjacency is flapping.
Answer: C,D
NO.3 Your Junos device is dropping certain traffic flows, while allowing other traffic flows to pass
through the device unaffected.
Which CoS component is causing this problem?
A. BA classification
B. RED
C. MF classification
D. Rewrite rules
Answer: D
NO.4 Your switch is experiencing a problem where a port that should have only one host connected
occasionally shows that multiple MAC addresses are being learned.
Which configuration setting would ensure that no extra hosts can join the network using this switch
port?
A. mac-limit
B. no-mac-learning
C. persistent-learning
D. bpdu-block-on-edge
Answer: D
NO.5 You are having problems redistributing RIP routes into OSPF. Your Junos device has the
following configuration:
[edit protocols ospf]
user@router# show
import my-policy;
area 0.0.0.0 {
interface ge-0/ 0/ 0.0;
interface ge-0/ 0/ ;
interface ge-0/ 0/ {
passive;
}
}
What would resolve the problem?
A. Apply my-policy as an export policy under the [edit protocols rip] hierarchy.
B. Apply my-policy as an import policy under the [edit protocols rip] hierarchy.
C. Apply my-policy as an export policy under the [edit protocols ospf] hierarchy.
D. Use the area-range parameter instead of a routing policy.
Answer: D
NO.6 Two neighboring routers are able to form an OSPF adjacency, but are not able to establish an
IBGP neighborship.
What are two reasons for the IBGP neighborship problem? (Choose two.)
A. One of the devices has a misconfigured BGP peer address.
B. One or both of the connected interfaces are missing the family iso statement.
C. OSPF has a lower route preference than BGP .
D. A firewall filter on one of the interfaces is blocking TCP traffic.
Answer: B,C
NO.7 You are troubleshooting a problem where an OSPF adjacency between two neighboring
routers will not form.
What are two reasons for this problem? (Choose two.)
A. One or both of the connected interfaces are missing the family inet statement.
B. One or both of the connected interfaces are missing the family iso statement.
C. The connected interfaces are not on the same subnet.
D. Another IGP is running on one or both of the routers, overriding OSPF.
Answer: B,D
NO.8 Your Layer 2 network uses VLAN IDs 100 through 400 and you are required to load-balance
these VLANs between two different root bridges. You are currently using the default RSTP settings
and notice that all VLANs are using the same root bridge.
How do you ensure the VLANs are load-balanced between two root bridges?
A. Configure MSTP with two MSTI regions and split the VLAN range between them.
B. Configure VSTP with two VLAN groups and split the VLAN range between them.
C. Configure two RSTP instances and split the VLAN range between them.
D. Configure STP and RSTP and split the VLAN range between them.
Answer: A
Juniper JN0-694 시험대비덤프공부
Posted 2013/9/25 5:28:59 | Category: 미분류 | Tag: